Wednesday, November 27, 2019

A Solution that Impacts essays

A Solution that Impacts essays Gandhi is probably the most well known non-violent protester of all times, followed by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Kings views on non-violence are all to clear in his I Have a Dream speech, where King said, We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Another passage of the same speech said, We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline, which shows that King didnt want his followers to lead undignified, violent protests (VanderMey). King knew that if the protests they led were violent then the police would just come and arrest the protesters and use violence against them, whereas if protesters used non-violence and then the police used violence the public would catch wind of the event and become interested or at least sympathetic. These non-violent protests were and are still effective due to the calm manner used in trying to talk situations out and come up with a conclusion. The first nonviolent protest that King led was the Montgomery bus boycott. This started with Rosa Parks arrest. Most everyone knows of this event, but not all know that it lead to Martin Luther King, Jr.s active role in protests for African American civil rights. With the success of the bus boycott, King realized the need for a way to unite all blacks for civil rights. He set out to organize the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or the SCLC, which allowed blacks to gather and discuss issues as well as set up a base for King to speak in the south (Martin). Later, in 1960, King moved to Atlanta to preach at the same church as his father. This place allowed King to dedicate more time to the civil rights movement and to the SCLC. Another protest of importance is the one for desegregation of lunch counters. College students asked King to support them, and them the police arrested King as well as others. From jail in Birmingham, King wrote a let...

Sunday, November 24, 2019

The Tuskegee Project essays

The Tuskegee Project essays In 1972 a great injustice was the Tuskegee study. It was a study performed in 1932 on 600 African-American men. 399 of the men were infected with the STD syphilis and 201 of them were not infected with the disease. All of these men were uneducated and poor. So when the government offered them free physical examinations, free rides to and from the clinics, free treatments for minor ailments, and a guarantee that a burial stipend would be paid to their survivors of course they accepted. Even though the men agreed they were not informed of what was supposed to happen in the study. But what they didn't know was that they would never receive the proper treatment for their disease. Even when penicillin was accepted as the treatment of choice for syphilis in 1945 the men were still not given the treatment. This study went on until 1972 exactly 40 years after it began. In 1947 an advisory panel found nothing to show that the subjects were ever given the choice of quitting the study, even whe n this new, highly effective treatment became widely used. The Tuskegee Study symbolizes the medical misconduct and blatant disregard for human rights. And the worst part about the whole thing is that the government let this happen. The doctors that participated in the study were performing unethical and immoral experiments on human subjects. Many people compare the Tuskegee Study to the in-human experiments performed on the Jewish. There was not a formal protocol for the study nor could one be provided. By the time the story broke in 1972 over 100 of the infected men had died, others suffered from serious syphilis related conditions that may have contributed to their later deaths. In 1973 Fred Gray a prominent civil rights lawyer, brought a $1.8 billion class action civil suit against many of those institutions and individual involved in the study. Gray also demanded 3 million in damages for each living participant and the heirs of th ...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Gastrointestinal disorders Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Gastrointestinal disorders - Essay Example Only 30% of the consumers are not the patient. These types of patients have low tolerance of pain and would resort to analgesics for pain relief. These patients have common complain of back ache or hip pain, headache, strains and sprains, osteoarthritis, sinus pain, fever, tendonitis, and tennis elbow. Generally, most of these patients asking for analgesics have no knowledge on the precautions, contraindications, adverse and toxic effects, tolerance, and physical dependence of the medications they requested. All they know about is that analgesics provide acute and chronic pain relief. Patients who came in to the pharmacy requesting for OTC analgesics oftentimes think that it can be used anytime without acquiring the potential side effects of the medications. Other than that, these patients are anticipating that pain relief can be achieved through constant intake of OTC analgesics. These expectations are often not met by the patients. A careful titration of analgesics by the patient is required for an effective management of pain based on valid and reliable pain assessment and pain relief (American Society for Pain Management Nursing, 2009). Over the counter analgesics are much exploited medications. These patients have no knowledge on the potential side effects of the medications they are taking. All they knew is that OTC analgesics provide pain relief. Research study carried on by the researchers in the US presented the potential risks of constant intake of non – prescription analgesics. Pain killers that include aspirin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen have the capacity to increase high blood pressure and pose a great risk of myocardial disease in men (Reuters, 2007 cited in Harrell, 2007). The pharmacist and pharmacy staff must discuss with the patient the appropriate pain medication that has to be taken, exact dosage of analgesics, and how to avoid exceeding maximum dose and potential drug interaction. To provide